Among the distinctive characteristics of most American pragmatists, we ve argued, is their claim that there is a strong continuity between science and philosophy.

Among the distinctive characteristics of most American pragmatists, we ve argued, is their claim that there is a strong continuity between science and philosophy. In John Dewey s case, what does this continuity mean for the positions we should reject as biased and untenable in our social and moral policies? Is Dewey trying to turn all of our problems into purely scientific ones? On what evidence would you agree?

Among the distinctive characteristics of most American pragmatists, we ve argued, is their claim that there is a strong continuity between science and philosophy.